[PD] propertybang-help

IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Thu Apr 1 16:52:31 CEST 2010

On 2010-04-01 16:21, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2010-03-31 19:49, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>> propertybang-help.pd says that [propertybang] is per abstraction, but it's 
>> per abstraction _instance_, right?
> indeed.
> but hen: how would you right-click on an abstraction class (that is: not
> an instance?)
>> Also, it states that you can't have them per subpatch-- what exactly does 
>> this mean?
> i guess it means that you cannot put it into a subpatch and expect the
> subpatch to have properties.

as a matter of fact this is wrong.
you can put [propertybang] into your [pd] and be happy with it.
i updated the help-patch.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20100401/ee23bf86/attachment.bin>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list