[PD] phasor~ and osc~ right inlet: signal?

[Andy Farnell]

You don't actually need the [wrap~] 
as the domain of [cos~] is already 
suited.

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:17:54 +0200
Roman Haefeli <reduzierer at yahoo.de> wrote:

> On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 02:10 -0700, Jaime Oliver wrote:
> > Hi all, 
> 
> > It would be great it phasor~ and/or osc~ could receive phase
> > information (right inlet) as a signal. 
> > objects like *~ can recognize if they are receiving a float or a
> > signal on their left inlet?
> > 
> > 
> > if this feature was added in vanilla, would it break anything?
> > is it possible, worthwhile?
> > is there a third party external doing this?
> 
> As IOhannes pointed out, it doesn't make too much sense to have the
> phase inlets fed by a signal.
> 
> What would you probably want is to be able to constantly shift the phase
> over time relative to an initially set absolute phase. This can be
> achieve by adding a constant to the [phasor~] signal and wrapping the
> the result.
> 
> [phasor~]
> |
> |   [inlet~ relative-phase-shift]
> |   | 
> [+~ ]
> |
> [wrap~] (<- use Pd's internal [wrap~] here, not zexy's)
> 
> 
> For a similar [osc~] replacement, just connect [wrap~]'s outlet to a
> [cos~].
> 
> Roman
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 	
> 		
> ___________________________________________________________ 
> Der fr_he Vogel f_ngt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de
> 
> 


-- 

-----------------------------------------------------------
Sent from my 3 (http://three.co.uk) mobile broadband
   Third world internet for a first world economy.
* 20 bytes/second * 99% packet loss  * 60 second latency
 All for only £20/month (Odious and predatory terms apply)