[PD] phasor~ and osc~ right inlet: signal?

Roman Haefeli reduzierer at yahoo.de
Wed Apr 14 14:13:36 CEST 2010


On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 12:51 +0100, Andy Farnell wrote:
> 
> You don't actually need the [wrap~] 
> as the domain of [cos~] is already 
> suited.

Ah yes, thanks.

But you still need for the [phasor~] replacement, right?

Roman


> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:17:54 +0200
> Roman Haefeli <reduzierer at yahoo.de> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 02:10 -0700, Jaime Oliver wrote:
> > > Hi all, 
> > 
> > > It would be great it phasor~ and/or osc~ could receive phase
> > > information (right inlet) as a signal. 
> > > objects like *~ can recognize if they are receiving a float or a
> > > signal on their left inlet?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > if this feature was added in vanilla, would it break anything?
> > > is it possible, worthwhile?
> > > is there a third party external doing this?
> > 
> > As IOhannes pointed out, it doesn't make too much sense to have the
> > phase inlets fed by a signal.
> > 
> > What would you probably want is to be able to constantly shift the phase
> > over time relative to an initially set absolute phase. This can be
> > achieve by adding a constant to the [phasor~] signal and wrapping the
> > the result.
> > 
> > [phasor~]
> > |
> > |   [inlet~ relative-phase-shift]
> > |   | 
> > [+~ ]
> > |
> > [wrap~] (<- use Pd's internal [wrap~] here, not zexy's)
> > 
> > 
> > For a similar [osc~] replacement, just connect [wrap~]'s outlet to a
> > [cos~].
> > 
> > Roman
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 	
> > 		
> > ___________________________________________________________ 
> > Der fr_he Vogel f_ngt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de
> > 
> > 
> 
> 



		
___________________________________________________________ 
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de




More information about the Pd-list mailing list