[PD] networking with Pd (was Re: (no subject))

[errordeveloper at gmail.com]

ALSA library is capable to do that for you,
look in aseqnet(1) manpage.
i haven't had a chance to use it yet myself..

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:05:29PM -0300, Ariane stolfi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> just another question in this subject,
> what do you sugest for sending midi values between two computers
> through ethernet?
> 
> tnx
> ariane
> 
> 2010/4/13 Andrew Faraday <jbturgid at hotmail.com>:
> > Thanks, folks, there's a lot to think about there.
> >
> > Another workshop this evening, so we'll see what we find most useful.
> >
> > Yeah, the lack of a subject was a sheer accident on my part.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> >> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:29:37 +0200
> >> From: zmoelnig at iem.at
> >> CC: pd-list at iem.at
> >> Subject: [PD] networking with Pd (was Re: (no subject))
> >>
> >> is there a reason for omitting the subject?
> >>
> >> On 2010-04-12 21:11, Paulo Casaes wrote:
> >> > netsend and netreceive can send any type of message. You should look
> >> > into OSC for your needs.
> >>
> >> well afaics, OSC doesn't give you any advantage with the original
> >> problems.
> >> the problem seems to be related to Pd's messages rather than the
> >> net-objects (e.g. "[blu( -> [send val1 $1(" won't work, but if you use
> >> "[symbol blu(" it will; see the Pd-documentation and the list archives
> >> for why this is so)
> >>
> >> >
> >> > In a related question, what is the difference between netsend and
> >> > sendOSC?
> >>
> >> #0 i don't know whether i have said this before, but just in case:
> >> [sendOSC] is unmaintained and buggy, and i would suggest to not use it.
> >> use mrpeach's [packOSC] and [udpsend] instead.
> >>
> >> #1 they are different objects; [netsend] uses FUDI (which looks just
> >> like Pd-messages) as the application layer protocol, whereas [sendOSC]
> >> oses OSC
> >>
> >> > Can netsend and netreceive be used for OSC?
> >>
> >> no.
> >> they are different, non-compatible application layer protocols (OSC uses
> >> binary data enriched with meta-data, whereas Pd's FUDI is plain text
> >> with a special meaning of semicolon)
> >>
> >> you can probably construct an OSC-message that is parseable as a FUDI
> >> message and vice-versa, but nothing that i would "use".
> >>
> >> fgmasr
> >> IOhannes
> >>
> >
> > ________________________________
> > Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up now.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list