[PD] Send and receive execution order was Re: Zen Garden, re-implementing the wheel in C++?

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

On 2010-04-19 09:27, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 03:24:56PM +0200, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote:
>> By the way a similar improvement in the message domain would be the
>> possibility to force an order among [r]s of a given [s]. In this
>> case the interface would be simpler: just a numeric argument for the
>> [r], for example: [s xxx], [r xxx 0], [r xxx 1], etc. where receives
>> with the same number would be executed in unpredictable order.
> 
> Btw. [gemhead] has this in a way.
> 

and [gemreceive] has it exactly in this way.

(its [gemreceive] because i would like to replace [gemhead] with an
abstraction, and don't depend on external libraries like iemguts where
you have the [oreceive] ("Ordered RECEIVE") object, both of which are
identically)


fgamsdr
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20100419/f564935e/attachment.bin>