[PD] naming objects
matju at artengine.ca
Mon Apr 26 18:18:11 CEST 2010
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
> One way of fixing this once and for all would be to have a separate
> [objectmaker] for each canvas (including abstractions, but not subpatches,
> ie, those canvases that have a t_canvasenvironment attached to them - at
> least that is how I understand that part of Pd's code).
Thanks for bringing back the topic. There was a thread about that on
pd-dev in september 2006, e.g. :
> I have a vague sketch of an implementation like this already, but it's quite
> brutal to the core of Pd so I doubt the changes would be accepted by anyone
> without me cleaning it up a lot and providing a clean .diff to a current
> development version of Pd...
cleanliness is in the eye of the beholder... if you spend a lot of time
cleaning, you can realise that it doesn't look any cleaner to the people
you want to please, or else it can look dirtier.
apart from that, I think that you deserve good luck with this project and
I am happy to learn that you succeeded.
but how does «t_pd *pd_newest» work in that context ?
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801
More information about the Pd-list