[PD] Compressor in Pd

patrick puredata at 11h11.com
Tue May 18 17:12:24 CEST 2010


> Roman
>
> P.S.: @pdmtl guys
> It's plain wrong to have a wet/dry parameter for dynamic processing fx.
> It just doesn't make sense at all to have the compressor output mixed
> with the input signal (It not only doesn't make sense, it even adds
> strange phasing effects, if the the dynamic processor uses a look-ahead
> delay).
> Can we agree on that? And if not, can we discuss this, so that we
> finally can agree on that?
>
>    

yes i do agree. for me it was important to have wet/dry for all fx, but 
of course it doesn't make sense for all fx.

there's mtl also available:
http://puredata.info/Members/mtl/index_html

à+
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20100518/f0abcd1a/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list