[PD] Patch Tracker WAS no reverb or delwrite~, delread~ working with -nogui onUbuntu 10.04
danomatika at gmail.com
Sat Jun 5 17:11:28 CEST 2010
It's nice to see the Pd community can agree upon such basic conventions.
On Jun 4, 2010, at 9:07 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> On Jun 4, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
>> Patches can also introduce bugs.
> Right. Such as the first version of my fix. I could have submitted that to the patch tracker as well. I don't think that you should rely on submission to the patch tracker as a sign of quality at all, even if there's somewhat a correlation. If you want quality, you ought to find it by other means.
>> The patch tracker is a tool for tracking bits of code. It has a useful forum interface for discussions on the topic, and allows people to see what's pending, what's accepted, rejected, etc. SVN/GIT does not do those things.
> Exactly. And then if I think about what would be different if the SVN was replaced by a FTP, I'm led to believe that it wouldn't make much of a difference : pure-data is not really "using" SVN.
> _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
> | Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list