[PD] software license for pd general patch?
matju at artengine.ca
Wed Jun 30 20:38:22 CEST 2010
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Bernardo Barros wrote:
> 2010/6/29 Frank Barknecht <fbar at footils.org>:
>> In this view, Miller has the biggest balls of dem all. :)
> Is there a legal reason for PD not be GPL? Maybe it has some code from
> another project?
If any code that Pd took from other projects had any license more
restricted than SIBSD, Miller wouldn't be able to call Pd as under SIBSD
license as a whole, he'd have to state "except such and such". This mostly
happens for some pieces in the /extra/ folder, such as [expr], which is
But if you want to see something really scary in Pd, look at
d_fft_mayer.c. If you understand at all what's the license of this, let
alone who owns the code and whether the license is legally invalidated by
patents, please tell me now.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801
More information about the Pd-list