[PD] PD extended, Linux 64 & 32 bits

[András Murányi]

Nope. It's gone.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1388451

Andras

2010/9/13 Pedro Lopes <pedro.lopes at ist.utl.pt>

> Sorry just double checking something András... there's no rt kernel for 64
> bits Ubuntu? (or you're saying for the lucid lynx?)
>
> Cause karmic koala has rt, I have Ubuntu Studio 64 bits with rt [1]
>
> [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/9.10release_notes
>
> 2010/9/13 András Murányi <muranyia at gmail.com>
>
>> Ahh, livna....
>> You know, know that i have convinced my Fedora friends to switch to
>> Ubuntu, what do I tall them when i go back? :o)
>> I'll take a look at it, and also at home-brewing a kernel. Maybe that's
>> the way forward.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andras
>>
>>
>> 2010/9/13 Bernardo Barros <bernardobarros2 at gmail.com>
>>
>>> Then you have to add Fusion free+non-free (maybe livna?) to your repos.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2010/9/13 András Murányi <muranyia at gmail.com>:
>>> > Hhh, switching distro seems harder than moving to another country
>>> > sometimes... :o)
>>> > I heard that some non-free stuff if missing from Fedora, does CCRMA
>>> have
>>> > these? Like some proprietary codecs, etc...
>>> >
>>> > 2010/9/13 Bernardo Barros <bernardobarros2 at gmail.com>
>>> >>
>>> >> yes, planet_ccrma is a repo for the Fedora/CentOS/RedHat family
>>> >> I like it
>>> >>
>>> >> 2010/9/13 András Murányi <muranyia at gmail.com>:
>>> >> > Hmm, hmm. That means switching to Fedora, right?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > 2010/9/13 Bernardo Barros <bernardobarros2 at gmail.com>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Planet CCRMA offers rt-kernel for x86_64 systems. Give it a try.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> 2010/9/13 András Murányi <muranyia at gmail.com>:
>>> >> >> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:59 PM, jm jones <juanmjv at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Hi, usually I install the 64 bits version of, but the last time,
>>> I
>>> >> >> >> dont remember why : ) (maybe to avoid any problems) I installed
>>> the
>>> >> >> >> 32
>>> >> >> >> bits version of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. Is a repo of pd-extended for
>>> 10.04
>>> >> >> >> available?
>>> >> >> >> And about the 32 vs 64 bits, what are your choices?  And what
>>> about
>>> >> >> >> distros? Pure:dyne seems more lightweight with his xfce desktop,
>>> >> >> >> however I have a good processor (core 2 duo intel e7200) and 2gb
>>> of
>>> >> >> >> ram, planning an update to 6gb, so I dont know if xfce is a must
>>> for
>>> >> >> >> me.
>>> >> >> >> Im a "veteran" gnu/linux user, but the last years I was using OS
>>> X
>>> >> >> >> and
>>> >> >> >> W7 for music making. In Linux I want to use pd, Renoise (its
>>> >> >> >> available
>>> >> >> >> as 64 bits too), and wine for some vsts.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Hi There,
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > I'm sort of a veteran too (started on IBM AIX in 1992, used Red
>>> Hat
>>> >> >> > for
>>> >> >> > a
>>> >> >> > long time, then went back to Windows 98, later XP, which i gave
>>> up
>>> >> >> > finally a
>>> >> >> > few years ago).
>>> >> >> > I'm using vanilla Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit with Gnome (and 2GB of
>>> memory),
>>> >> >> > and my
>>> >> >> > impression is that it's not the WM that makes things slow, but in
>>> the
>>> >> >> > case
>>> >> >> > of Pd, it's Pd itself. Read the archives on GUI<->core
>>> communication
>>> >> >> > and
>>> >> >> > Tcl/Tk weirdnesses. The 64-bit version of Pd is quite tidy now,
>>> well
>>> >> >> > actually there was a time when it seemed to me a bit slower than
>>> the
>>> >> >> > 32-bit
>>> >> >> > version, but AFAIK there's no reason for that any more (?)
>>> >> >> > With a decent CPU and that huge amount of RAM you (will) have, it
>>> >> >> > really
>>> >> >> > cannot be a question of WM whatsoever. Of course, the system has
>>> to
>>> >> >> > be
>>> >> >> > tuned
>>> >> >> > for realtime, undisturbed audio usage, which may include getting
>>> rid
>>> >> >> > of
>>> >> >> > eye-candy functions, but i never experienced a problem with
>>> those.
>>> >> >> > After
>>> >> >> > all, they use openGL, don't they?
>>> >> >> > The same stands for pure:dyne; at the core it's a linux kernel,
>>> and
>>> >> >> > what
>>> >> >> > you
>>> >> >> > install on (or remove from) the top, it's up to you.
>>> >> >> > The only thing i'm missing here on 64-bit is the RT kernel. Once
>>> i
>>> >> >> > find
>>> >> >> > a
>>> >> >> > nice quick way, i'll grab it, but i'm not really into
>>> home-brewing my
>>> >> >> > kernel. :)
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Muranyi Andras
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Muranyi Andras
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Pedro Lopes (ongoing MSc)
> contact: pedro.lopes at ist.utl.pt
> website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes
>



-- 
Muranyi Andras
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20100914/743852cf/attachment.htm>