[PD] (GEM) mjpeg decoding performance question

IOhannes zmölnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Fri Sep 24 10:03:27 CEST 2010


On 09/23/2010 09:34 PM, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote:
> 
> Does it depend entirely on the quality setting, or is it possible that
> different implementations of the encoder encode in such a way that it is
> then more or less expensive for the decoder to decode?

i would suspect that recoding the video might lead to a cleaner
structure of the framerate information.
e.g. if the original video has a variable framerate though e.g. all the
frames have the same length, and the re-encoded video has a fixed
framerate (of the same length), the you might get noticeable performance
improvements.

fgmasdr
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20100924/8be85754/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list