[PD] pix_opencv for Mac OS X

[ydegoyon at gmail.com]

Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 22:07 +0200, ydegoyon at gmail.com wrote:
>
>    
>> but obviously the intention is to abandon some libraries
>>      
> That is certainly not true. You're looking from the wrong perspective.
> It's not the case that someone decides _not_ to include certain
> libraries, it's more that some people are interested in doing the work
> to get certain libraries included. In the case of pdp there is not even
> a need for that effort, since it is already included, as IOhannes
> pointed out.
>    
this is absolutely wrong, this package is old
and doesn't respect pd-extended rules at all ...


so stop believing superficial information, thank you
( the name pd-pdp doesn't mean nothing at all )


ciao,
sevy