[PD] OSC messages without / (fwd)

[Leandro da Mota Damasceno]

Hi Roman

It's ok, i just keep forgetting to reply to all...

so, I really don't understand how that could be happening, especially when
in max/MSP i don't have to route any #bundle tag. It's funny how it shows
how different it is to work with osc in both languages.  the deadline for
next week is what is actually getting me worried...

best

Leandro


On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Leandro
>
> Sorry for not having responded quickly.
>
> I know that OSC supports so-called bundled messages. However, I haven't
> yet investigated how they actually work. It seems like your Max patch is
> sending bundled OSC messages. It seems like those are tagged with a
> '#bundle' and obviously the '/' is prepended to #bundle tag instead of
> the OSC address.
>
> I don't have a solution at hand for this, since it makes OSC message
> parsing in the byte realm even more complex.
>
> Probably there are some other ways to 'de-bundle' those messages first
> before prepending them a '/'? (Question to the commmunity)
>
> Roman
>
> P.S.: I think this discussion is still interesting for the list, so I
> cc'ed to the list.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 09:41 +0200, Leandro da Mota Damasceno wrote:
> > Hi Roman. My print message is returning something like:
> >
> >
> > mensagem: /#bundle likeliest 1
> >
> >
> > it was supposed to be /likeliest 1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Best,
> >
> >
> > Leandro
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >         Sorry, I definitely missed your reply then. Can you post the
> >         error
> >         message again?
> >
> >         Roman
> >
> >
> >         On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 02:46 +0200, Leandro da Mota Damasceno
> >         wrote:
> >         > It partially worked. It seems to be something ALMOST there,
> >         but I got
> >         > an error message. I posted a few days ago. But it's
> >         definitely the
> >         > best solution right now
> >         >
> >         > On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Roman Haefeli
> >         <reduzent at gmail.com>
> >         > wrote:
> >         >         On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 09:40 +0200, Leandro da Mota
> >         Damasceno
> >         >         wrote:
> >         >         > Hi
> >         >         >
> >         >         >
> >         >         > I would like to apologize for the private emails.
> >         it's that
> >         >         when I
> >         >         > reply to the messages they go to the author, not
> >         the list.
> >         >         Weird.
> >         >         > that's not what happens in other mailing lists...
> >         >         >
> >         >         >
> >         >         > So, I have tried to fix the standalone as jasch
> >         suggested,
> >         >         but i got
> >         >         > all sorts of error messages. I would have to work
> >         almost
> >         >         from scratch
> >         >         > and if my knowledge on PD is still in beginner
> >         level, my
> >         >         knowledge of
> >         >         > max/MSP is almost null. Unfortunately, I'm on a
> >         deadline to
> >         >         have this
> >         >         > thing working, so I need a workaround by next
> >         week.
> >         >         >
> >         >         >
> >         >         > So right now, I'd rather not mess with the
> >         standalone and
> >         >         working on a
> >         >         > new version by myself in a few weeks from now.
> >         Martin, I can
> >         >         send you
> >         >         > the patch, but I'm afraid it won't be any helpful
> >         for this
> >         >         case, since
> >         >         > it depends on dating coming from the standalone. I
> >         can give
> >         >         it to you,
> >         >         > of course, if you want. But I think it's pretty
> >         much what
> >         >         has been
> >         >         > described here. The best solution for now I think
> >         would be
> >         >         to have a
> >         >         > way to get ordinary messages through udp. No OSC
> >         standards.
> >         >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >         Sorry in case I missed it, but did the abstraction I
> >         sent you
> >         >         recently
> >         >         not work? I don't think, that it should be too
> >         difficult to
> >         >         find a way
> >         >         to deal with the faulty OSC messages in Pd (so that
> >         you don't
> >         >         have to
> >         >         touch the standalone max/msp patch).
> >         >
> >         >         Roman
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20101027/748a1457/attachment-0001.htm>