[PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

[Jonathan Wilkes]

--- On Tue, 12/7/10, Andy Farnell <padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk> wrote:

> From: Andy Farnell <padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian
> To: pd-list at iem.at
> Date: Tuesday, December 7, 2010, 9:50 AM
> You could be forgiven. The effort to
> forge this confusion is 
> one of the defining propaganda campaigns of the 21st
> Century.
> There are lawyers out there who don't know the difference.

The difference between what and what?

-Jonathan

> 
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 20:54:19 -0500 (EST)
> Mathieu Bouchard <matju at artengine.ca>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> > 
> > > Its not "illegal" because its a not about laws,
> but rather copyright 
> > > licenses, which is more like contracts, i.e.
> agreements between private 
> > > parties.
> > 
> > Right. I used the wrong word. I'm sorry.
> > 
> >   _______________________________________________________________________
> > | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ----
> Villeray, Montréal, QC
> 
> 
> -- 
> Andy Farnell <padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at
> mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>