[PD] loadbang not sent for dynamically created objects?

[Pedro Lopes]

>yes, this is known.
By known you mean.. Is it on the bug tracker already?

When such things are discovered (and by things I mean issues), shouldn't
they be documented inside the help patches?

It helps a lot those getting inside pd.

Best,
pedro


On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 7:44 PM, cyrille henry <ch at chnry.net> wrote:

> hello,
>
> yes, this is known.
> you have to explicitly send the loadbang, like in this patch, using your
> exemple.
> (don't know about initbang, i don't use it)
> c
>
>
> Le 19/02/2011 20:33, John Harrison a écrit :
>
>> is it correct behavior that loadbang will not be called when it is part of
>> a dynamically created object? See attached. If you load test-do, it will
>> create an instance of test when you click on the message. Test should print
>> loadbang and initbang, but it only prints initbang.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>


-- 
Pedro Lopes (MSc)
contact: pedro.lopes at ist.utl.pt
website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes /
http://pedrolopesresearch.wordpress.com/ | http://twitter.com/plopesresearch
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20110219/e8d5c0f9/attachment.htm>