[PD] loadbang not sent for dynamically created objects?

[John Harrison]

Cyrille I just tried your solution and the problem is that all objects
sharing the name of the dynamically-created object all get the loadbang
message.

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Pedro Lopes <pedro.lopes at ist.utl.pt> wrote:

> >yes, this is known.
> By known you mean.. Is it on the bug tracker already?
>
> When such things are discovered (and by things I mean issues), shouldn't
> they be documented inside the help patches?
>
> It helps a lot those getting inside pd.
>
> Best,
> pedro
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 7:44 PM, cyrille henry <ch at chnry.net> wrote:
>
>> hello,
>>
>> yes, this is known.
>> you have to explicitly send the loadbang, like in this patch, using your
>> exemple.
>> (don't know about initbang, i don't use it)
>> c
>>
>>
>> Le 19/02/2011 20:33, John Harrison a écrit :
>>
>>> is it correct behavior that loadbang will not be called when it is part
>>> of a dynamically created object? See attached. If you load test-do, it will
>>> create an instance of test when you click on the message. Test should print
>>> loadbang and initbang, but it only prints initbang.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Pedro Lopes (MSc)
> contact: pedro.lopes at ist.utl.pt
> website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes /
> http://pedrolopesresearch.wordpress.com/ |
> http://twitter.com/plopesresearch
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20110219/8cd888d2/attachment.htm>