[PD] [PD-announce] pmpd v 0.10

[Jack]

Le lundi 28 février 2011 à 14:27 +0100, cyrille henry a écrit :
> 
> Le 28/02/2011 11:41, Jack a écrit :
> > It would be nice to have a second outlet on [pmpd], [pmpd2d] and
> > [pmpd3d] like on MSD objects.
> it's not very complex, but i'm really wondering why one would need it.
> i'll make it if you convince me that it's usefull.
Yep :)
It is useful because you can see in the console the masses created with
their id and links created between two masses with their id. So it is
useful to debug.
> 
> > The 54_pmpd_wave.pd example doesn't work here.
> > [pmpd] seems to have a problem.
> i correct a problem after the official annonce. could you make sur you have the last version (svn update)
> thanks
> and tell me if that solve the pb.
It seems it doesn't solve the problem because i compiled pmpd today
(sources from svn) :
$ svn up
À la révision 14977.
> 
> > Do test and interaction objects work with [pmpd], [pmpd2d] and [pmpd3d]
> > masses ?
> no
> 
> from a technical point of view, they could be working. but pmpd* are really MSD* clone.
> and the philosophies is a bit different.
OK.
> you can very easilly make 100 connections. that should replace interactor objects.
I tried to make a segment (like [iSeg]) of several masses in the past
but it was not a good solution. I guess the best solution is to test
position of each mass and then add force on it.
> 
> but yes, pmpd have a wider range of interactor shape, so it may be interesting someday to make them work.
Would be nice !
++

Jack


> 
> ++
> c
> 
> 
> > ++
> >
> > Jack
> >
> >
> >
> > Le jeudi 24 février 2011 à 19:04 +0100, cyrille henry a écrit :
> >> hello,
> >> i've made a new pmpd version.
> >> There is 3 new objects : pmpd, pmpd2d and pmpd3d.
> >> this 3 objects should replace MSD. most of the time, they are compatible.
> >> there is few differences anyway :
> >> - few messages get renamed (both on input or output)
> >> - there is a difference on the calculation of tLink Damping
> >> - there is now a damping associate with each masses
> >> - there are more messages to get simulation data
> >>
> >> I encourage anyone to switch from MSD to pmpd, since MSD will not be maintained.
> >>
> >> help / examples / sources can be found on pd svn.
> >>
> >> Cyrille
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pd-announce mailing list
> >> Pd-announce at iem.at
> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-announce
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->  http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->  http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20110228/61bde217/attachment.pgp>