[PD] route - pack issue

[Jack]

Yep, there is a bug. For a workaround, you can add a [bang( message
between [route] and [pack].
++

Jack



Le jeudi 07 juillet 2011 à 17:44 +0100, Joe White a écrit :
> Hi list,
> 
> 
> I've been doing some patching with [route] and came across a problem -
> I'd love it if someone could explain why this happens otherwise I
> think it's a bug. 
> 
> 
> Basically I'm sending a message with one item to a route object with
> an argument of the same name. For example:
> 
> 
> [start (
> |
> [route start]
> 
> 
> This is connected to a [pack f]. When I bang the start message the
> route object outputs a bang, which in turn should output the stored
> number in the pack object. However, this does not happen (which is the
> problem). 
> 
> 
> If I connect a [t b] after the [route] and before the [pack f] it
> works. It also works with [f ] instead of [pack f] and a [select]
> object will correctly bang the pack. I've attached a patch to show
> this. 
> 
> 
> What seems weird is that it is not a problem with either [route] or
> [pack f] on their own, but rather only when they are connected.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Joe  
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20110707/bb436d7d/attachment.pgp>