[PD] "get" method for Pd

[Jonathan Wilkes]

----- Original Message -----

> From: Mathieu Bouchard <matju at artengine.ca>
> To: IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>
> Cc: pd-list at iem.at
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 3:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [PD] "get" method for Pd
> 
> Le 2011-11-21 à 12:58:00, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
>>  while i'm all for "one objectclass per functionality", and 
> for
>>  establishing a single idiom (at least, per "objectclass family") 
> - and
>>  thus think i'm with hans also, i still don't see any point in
>>  "masquerading as a single class".
>>  what makes the name [list foo] any better than [listfoo]?

Yeahreallythey'rebothequallyclearespeciallyformusicianswhoaren'tprogrammers.

Justlikereadingamusicscore--whitespacedoesn'taffectreadabilitythatmuch.

> 
> It's a form of namespacing.

Hyphens work, too, but two words against each other are less readable.

-Jonathan

> 
> Ask Hans what makes the name ::pdtk_canvas::pdtk_canvas_popup any better than 
> just pdtk_canvas_popup... I don't get it either, and on top of that, I 
> don't get the point of the the repetitive repetition of of pdtk_canvas 
> pdtk_canvas.
> 
>>  objects with "proper" names - that don't involve 
> "mummmers" - can still
>>  share the same help-patch (if needed).
> 
> (What are you talking about ?)
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> | Mathieu BOUCHARD ----- téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 ----- Montréal, QC
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>