[PD] "get" method for Pd

Mathieu Bouchard matju at artengine.ca
Mon Nov 21 21:02:12 CET 2011

Le 2011-11-21 à 12:58:00, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
> while i'm all for "one objectclass per functionality", and for
> establishing a single idiom (at least, per "objectclass family") - and
> thus think i'm with hans also, i still don't see any point in
> "masquerading as a single class".
> what makes the name [list foo] any better than [listfoo]?

It's a form of namespacing.

Ask Hans what makes the name ::pdtk_canvas::pdtk_canvas_popup any better 
than just pdtk_canvas_popup... I don't get it either, and on top of that, 
I don't get the point of the the repetitive repetition of of pdtk_canvas 

> objects with "proper" names - that don't involve "mummmers" - can still
> share the same help-patch (if needed).

(What are you talking about ?)

| Mathieu BOUCHARD ----- téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 ----- Montréal, QC

More information about the Pd-list mailing list