[PD] vline~ precision, or sequentially segmented playback of a buffer

João Pais jmmmpais at googlemail.com
Wed Mar 14 11:51:42 CET 2012

>> The offset of [tabread4~] was there to avoid any reading errors when the
>> index points get too high (the whole sample is almost 7m long). So
>> there's not option for this, but to use only the right entry?
> I believe it should be possible to correct the timing issues of the  
> offset inlet
> with some additional calculations involving [timer] and [bang~] that take
> into account that this inlet is only updated at block boundaries. It's  
> probably a bit
> tricky to get right, but I suppose it could work.

shouldn't it make sense that, instead of a workaround, all features of  
[tabread4~] would behave the same way?


More information about the Pd-list mailing list