[PD] Array resize : bug?

[katja]

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Pierre Massat <pimassat at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Katja,
>
> I confirm this behaviour in windows too. So I understand that the actual
> number of samples is the same, the only difference being that they all fit
> within the GOP frame when resized by a message, whereas the last sample is
> out of the frame when the size is set upon creation.
>
> Should I report a bug? Or is there a reason to this?

Oops, seems I responded off-list by accident.

The initial situation with the last sample outside the frame is
annoying, I guess this could be reported as a bug.

>
> 2012/3/16 katja <katjavetter at gmail.com>
>>
>> Hello Pierre,
>>
>> With Pd-extended 0.42.5 for OSX it's similar to your description.
>> However, when resizing to a low size like 10, and manually counting
>> the number of 'sliders', it can be verified that the correct number of
>> points is visually represented.
>>
>> Katja
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Pierre Massat <pimassat at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Dear list,
>> >
>> > I've just noticed a strange behaviour of arrays in Pd-extended 0.42.5
>> > running in Win XP.
>> > When I manually create an array and set it's size through its properties
>> > (right-click, etc.), say, to 44100 samples, the range on the X axis is 0
>> > to
>> > 44099. Fine.
>> > Now when I resize it by sending it a message ("array1 resize 44100"),
>> > the X
>> > axis now spans from 0 to 44100 (that is 44101 samples).
>> >
>> > Anybody noticed this in other versions/platforms?
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > Pierre.
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>> >
>
>