[PD] settable receive again
Ivica Ico Bukvic
ico at vt.edu
Sat Jun 9 16:39:40 CEST 2012
This may be a bit off-topic, but here it goes anyhow. If you guys need dynamically setable receives that will not crash pd, try the latest pd-l2ork (version 20120607).
Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A
Composition, Music Technology
Director, DISIS Interactive Sound & Intermedia Studio
Director, L2Ork Linux Laptop Orchestra
Assistant Director, CCTAD
Department of Music
Blacksburg, VA 24061-0240
(540) 231-5034 (fax)
Cyrille Henry <ch at chnry.net> wrote:
Le 08/06/2012 19:15, Jonathan Wilkes a écrit :
>> anyway, if you really in need for a settable send and a settable receive, you
>> can always use prepends and route that are both settable.
>> see small attached abstraction.
> I think you are stuck for two reasons
> 1) [r setable_send_receive] is global. I want the parent $0 in front of it so that
> my abstraction symbols don't clash with other abstractions.
i don't understand this point : just ignore the settable_send_receive stuff that is hidden inside ss and sr.
this 2 abstractions work exactly like a real settable send and receive, at least for the local / global send.
i.e. if you want a local only send/receive, just use $0-bla, like you would have done with "real" send / receive.
that the route that filter content of different abstraction. the only problem is CPU overload, but that should really be minor.
> 2) Your example filters messages in a way that s/r doesn't. It's possible to hack
> around this using three extra objects.
yes, right. but that is a minor problem. not a show stopper.
> It is also possible to get the arguments of
> an abstraction in Pd Vanilla. With the former, I'd rather send a single message to
> an inlet and be done.
Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list