[PD] [TogEdge] - anything else ?

[tim vets]

2012/6/20 Marian Weger <mail at marianweger.com>

> Am 20.06.12 16:43, schrieb Фывапр Олджэвич:
>
>  so the thing with
>>
>> [bang(
>> |
>> [tgl]
>> |
>> [sel 0]_____
>> |                      \
>> [nmbrbox\     [nmbrbox\
>>
>> propsed by Tim , - is the solution, and I used such a thing, but I
>> thought that the readymade object is more stable - thatswhy i recoded
>> everything with [TogEdge] ..
>>
>> is the [sel]-chain more stable in fast algorithms ?
>>
>
> i don't know [TogEdge], but the "[sel]-chain solution" is completely
> stable.
> replacing externals by built-in functions would also be more future-proof.
>
> perhaps, it would be even more stable if no gui object is involved.
> the toggle could be replaced by a simple counter with modulo.
>
>
don't know if it matters if the tgl isn't visible,
but i guess you could also use:
[i ]X[== 0]


>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/**
> listinfo/pd-list <http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20120620/1db6a987/attachment.htm>