[PD] [TogEdge] - anything else ?

[José Luis Santorcuato Tapia]

Maybe you could test [edge]

Best

José

2012/6/20 tim vets <timvets at gmail.com>

>
>
> 2012/6/20 Marian Weger <mail at marianweger.com>
>
>> Am 20.06.12 16:43, schrieb Фывапр Олджэвич:
>>
>>  so the thing with
>>>
>>> [bang(
>>> |
>>> [tgl]
>>> |
>>> [sel 0]_____
>>> |                      \
>>> [nmbrbox\     [nmbrbox\
>>>
>>> propsed by Tim , - is the solution, and I used such a thing, but I
>>> thought that the readymade object is more stable - thatswhy i recoded
>>> everything with [TogEdge] ..
>>>
>>> is the [sel]-chain more stable in fast algorithms ?
>>>
>>
>> i don't know [TogEdge], but the "[sel]-chain solution" is completely
>> stable.
>> replacing externals by built-in functions would also be more future-proof.
>>
>> perhaps, it would be even more stable if no gui object is involved.
>> the toggle could be replaced by a simple counter with modulo.
>>
>>
> don't know if it matters if the tgl isn't visible,
> but i guess you could also use:
> [i ]X[== 0]
>
>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/**
>> listinfo/pd-list <http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>


-- 
http://arselectronicachile.blogspot.com
http://comunicacionnativa.blogspot.com/
http://www.myspace.com/santorcuato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20120620/7edb8dd6/attachment-0001.htm>