[PD] [TogEdge] - anything else ?
José Luis Santorcuato Tapia
santorcuato76 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 20 17:37:16 CEST 2012
Maybe you could test [edge]
2012/6/20 tim vets <timvets at gmail.com>
> 2012/6/20 Marian Weger <mail at marianweger.com>
>> Am 20.06.12 16:43, schrieb Фывапр Олджэвич:
>> so the thing with
>>> [sel 0]_____
>>> | \
>>> [nmbrbox\ [nmbrbox\
>>> propsed by Tim , - is the solution, and I used such a thing, but I
>>> thought that the readymade object is more stable - thatswhy i recoded
>>> everything with [TogEdge] ..
>>> is the [sel]-chain more stable in fast algorithms ?
>> i don't know [TogEdge], but the "[sel]-chain solution" is completely
>> replacing externals by built-in functions would also be more future-proof.
>> perhaps, it would be even more stable if no gui object is involved.
>> the toggle could be replaced by a simple counter with modulo.
> don't know if it matters if the tgl isn't visible,
> but i guess you could also use:
> [i ]X[== 0]
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/**
>> listinfo/pd-list <http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list>
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list