[PD] ipoke~ ?

Matt Barber brbrofsvl at gmail.com
Thu Jun 21 16:28:38 CEST 2012

Yep, count me in. I'm going to be out for a week but will have email
access on my phone.

A couple of years ago there was a big discussion about different cubic
interpolators, and some of us put together classes and did some
benchmarking on the different approaches. I'm not sure how [ipoke~]
does what it does, but I'd want to leave the idea of several
approaches open (maybe along the lines outlined in this thread) to see
what will work best for Pd.


On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Julian Brooks <jbeezez at gmail.com> wrote:
> Apologies for the delay in responding, I'm also away atm.
> Katja & Matt (and anyone else) - we should contact P.A. and get this
> moving.  It may be best if we formulate an email between us to get the
> source code, rather than us all contacting him separately, and take it from
> there.  I'm more than happy to keep this on-list (unless it pisses people
> off) in the spirit of open communication.  Perhaps we should fork the topic
> though?
> Really good that people are up for this, makes me happy.
> Cheers,
> Julian
> P.S. Something been bugging me about my previous email.  I really don't want
> to in any way denigrate the work that H.C. puts into PdE.  What I meant by
> P.A. only being into vanilla is the robustness and cross platform nature of
> vanilla and that some of the objects in Extended work on some os's and not
> others.  Or something.  Hmmm, perhaps I should just stop digging in this
> particular hole.
> Let's not forget that P.A.'s also hardcore Max/MSP so, you know, I've had
> nearly 3 years of him trying to get a rise out of me about all of this.  No
> question though that he's slowly moving over to our direction these days.

More information about the Pd-list mailing list