[PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.43-3 released
jmmmpais at googlemail.com
Wed Jul 4 18:33:49 CEST 2012
I would find it very simple if a method would allow me to find scalar nr
2571 (I have a patch with many more) by sending the message [traverse
xxxx, bang, next 2571(, than by building a [2571(-[until]-[next(
structure. Or for example, it's impossible (?) to erase scalers without
using the mouse.
Making those simple/trivial operations less laborious to program - i.e.,
incorporate them into [pointer] - could be a good way of making data
structures more accessible. which was anyway, the original drive to create
Pd, as I read in your paper (right?).
or, what was meant with "unnecessary complexity"?
> Yeah... I'm still trying to figure out how to make data structures less
> clunky without adding unnecessary complexity... I'm planning to go back
> and look at that again.
More information about the Pd-list