[PD] patching readanysf~

IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Mon Sep 3 09:02:10 CEST 2012


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2012-08-30 20:12, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>> all the patches are already applied, so no need to do that
>> yourself.
> 
> 
> Debian wheezy [1] and Ubuntu Precise [2] both still have 0.42-1,
> which AFAIK is a version without the linking order patch.  Or am I
> missing something?

let's put it that way: debian wheezy and friends include a compiled
version of [readanysf~[.
whether or not the linking order patch is applied is of secondary
concern, as the ordinary user needs the binary rather than the patch.

fgmasdr
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlBEVesACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvSF8ACeNTEVWjjkye8RTulT7kkQKzgp
W2oAnjHgb6tJjc8Cf0RMTwIgOLW/S41R
=p4ya
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2320 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20120903/205ceee7/attachment.bin>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list