[PD] ANN: pd-l2ork 20121019 stable candidate now available

Ivica Bukvic ico at vt.edu
Fri Nov 9 18:57:40 CET 2012


I can see the potential problems. I have however pointed out in the site in
the next bullet immediately below the download links "Precompiled for
Ubuntu (may also work on other distributions)." I guess I really need to
move to the deb model of distribution...
On Nov 9, 2012 12:13 PM, "András Murányi" <muranyia at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Ico, I completely understood what you meant by compiling from
> source. I just wanted to point out that there is no notice with the
> download link nor a check during "make install" so the "best option for
> newcomers" binary can eventually screw up someone's installation, and that
> someone may or may not have the time/skills/heart to compile the thing from
> source. It's not 100% safe.
> Me, I'll compile it as soon as I have some time.
>
> András
>
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Ivica Bukvic <ico at vt.edu> wrote:
>
>> Well, those are binaries you tried installing. The script included in the
>> full package simply copies files, it does not do any dependency checks.
>> What you need to do is to compile from source...
>>  On Nov 9, 2012 11:57 AM, "András Murányi" <muranyia at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> (Ouch) OK :)
>>> I don't know what's possible during a "make install" but ideally it
>>> would check for the presence of the right glibc in order not to install
>>> something that won't work.
>>>
>>> András
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Ivica Bukvic <ico at vt.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> These were compiled on Ubuntu 12.04. If your distribution uses older
>>>> version of glibc, you will have to compile your own from the dev package.
>>>> Simply follow instructions on the software page. It is pretty much
>>>> automated process provided you have installed all the dependencies (also
>>>> listed on the page).
>>>>
>>>> If anyone is interested in helping me package debs please contact me.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> On Nov 9, 2012 10:28 AM, "András Murányi" <muranyia at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic <ico at vt.edu> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Apologies for x-posting...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is my pleasure to announce latest version a.k.a. stable candidate
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> pd-l2ork. Having chased down a couple of lingering and extremely
>>>>>> sporadic
>>>>>> bugs, I am pleased to report that this latest version is our first
>>>>>> "beta"
>>>>>> release with the primary focus on ensuring 100% stable experience. The
>>>>>> latest version also includes updates to the K12 module which now
>>>>>> includes
>>>>>> over 40 unique abstractions. As usual, for additional info as well as
>>>>>> both
>>>>>> 32-bit and 64-bit Linux builds please visit
>>>>>> http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/?page_id=56
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I've installed Pd-l2ork-full-x86_64-20121108.tar.bz2 on Ubuntu Lucid
>>>>> and when I start pd-l2ork I get the following error:
>>>>> pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by
>>>>> pd-l2ork)
>>>>> pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by
>>>>> pd-l2ork)
>>>>>
>>>>> András
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20121109/43f5a358/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list