[PD] ANN: pd-l2ork 20121019 stable candidate now available

[András Murányi]

Well, my humble suggestion is to extend the bullet to read "Precompiled for
Ubuntu 12.04 Precise (may also work on other distributions)."
I assume adding a check to "make install" is the more complicated way.

András

On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Ivica Bukvic <ico at vt.edu> wrote:

> I can see the potential problems. I have however pointed out in the site
> in the next bullet immediately below the download links "Precompiled for
> Ubuntu (may also work on other distributions)." I guess I really need to
> move to the deb model of distribution...
>  On Nov 9, 2012 12:13 PM, "András Murányi" <muranyia at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Ico, I completely understood what you meant by compiling from
>> source. I just wanted to point out that there is no notice with the
>> download link nor a check during "make install" so the "best option for
>> newcomers" binary can eventually screw up someone's installation, and that
>> someone may or may not have the time/skills/heart to compile the thing from
>> source. It's not 100% safe.
>> Me, I'll compile it as soon as I have some time.
>>
>> András
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Ivica Bukvic <ico at vt.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Well, those are binaries you tried installing. The script included in
>>> the full package simply copies files, it does not do any dependency checks.
>>> What you need to do is to compile from source...
>>>  On Nov 9, 2012 11:57 AM, "András Murányi" <muranyia at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> (Ouch) OK :)
>>>> I don't know what's possible during a "make install" but ideally it
>>>> would check for the presence of the right glibc in order not to install
>>>> something that won't work.
>>>>
>>>> András
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Ivica Bukvic <ico at vt.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> These were compiled on Ubuntu 12.04. If your distribution uses older
>>>>> version of glibc, you will have to compile your own from the dev package.
>>>>> Simply follow instructions on the software page. It is pretty much
>>>>> automated process provided you have installed all the dependencies (also
>>>>> listed on the page).
>>>>>
>>>>> If anyone is interested in helping me package debs please contact me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> On Nov 9, 2012 10:28 AM, "András Murányi" <muranyia at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic <ico at vt.edu>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apologies for x-posting...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is my pleasure to announce latest version a.k.a. stable candidate
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> pd-l2ork. Having chased down a couple of lingering and extremely
>>>>>>> sporadic
>>>>>>> bugs, I am pleased to report that this latest version is our first
>>>>>>> "beta"
>>>>>>> release with the primary focus on ensuring 100% stable experience.
>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>> latest version also includes updates to the K12 module which now
>>>>>>> includes
>>>>>>> over 40 unique abstractions. As usual, for additional info as well
>>>>>>> as both
>>>>>>> 32-bit and 64-bit Linux builds please visit
>>>>>>> http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/?page_id=56
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've installed Pd-l2ork-full-x86_64-20121108.tar.bz2 on Ubuntu Lucid
>>>>>> and when I start pd-l2ork I get the following error:
>>>>>> pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by
>>>>>> pd-l2ork)
>>>>>> pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by
>>>>>> pd-l2ork)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> András
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20121109/ac684518/attachment-0001.htm>