[PD] Max's [rate~] implementation...

[Alexandros Drymonitis]

Well, I guess that would do as well, didn't think very thoroughly I guess.
Still it doesn't sound the same with either versions of [rate~] when I put
the patch together.
Anyway, thanks a lot.


On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at>wrote:

>
> Leaving out [rate~] should use less CPU since [rate~] doesn't have to do
> the analysis part, if I understand it correctly.
>
>
>
> .hc
>
> On Dec 6, 2012, at 9:24 AM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
>
> Don't think I really follow. Each [rate~] actually outputs a [phasor~]
> with a different frequency (different frequency ratio), all driven by the
> same [phasor~]. How can you send a value from one number box to all
> [phasor~]s?
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at>wrote:
>
>>
>> Why not just use a phasor~ per rate~ and then have the frequency of all
>> them controlled by the same number box?
>>
>> .hc
>>
>> On Dec 6, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
>>
>> copy this patch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6P4Ezz9aWa8&feature=plcp
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Simon Iten <itensimon at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> What are you trying to accomplish?
>>> On Dec 6, 2012 2:48 PM, "Alexandros Drymonitis" <adrcki at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> How can one implement Max's [rate~] in Pd? [rate~] takes a signal from
>>>> a [phasor~] and according to its argument it scales the frequency (roughly
>>>> speaking). So
>>>>
>>>> [phasor~ 1]
>>>> |
>>>> [rate~ 1.5]
>>>>
>>>> will actually give a [phasor~ 1.5]. I thought of [wrap] but that won't
>>>> do the trick with non-integers.
>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>>>
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20121206/82858ecf/attachment-0001.htm>