[PD] [pix_mix]

Alexandros Drymonitis adrcki at gmail.com
Mon Dec 31 19:02:31 CET 2012

I guess you're right. Got stuck with using Gem-first objects..

On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 7:57 PM, <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:

> Quoting Alexandros Drymonitis <adrcki at gmail.com>:
>  Anyway, I replaced [pix_mix] with a couple of [spigot]s inside a subpatch
>> and it works fine. Still, I think [pix_mix] would be more correct, so to
>> say, since I'm using Gem..
> it's hard to say what is more correct, as we don't know you patch. esp. we
> don't know what [pix_mix] is supposed to do.
> if you only use [pix_mix] to switch between two different image sources
> (rather than blending between 2 images), then [spigot] is probably the
> better object to use anyhow (e.g. in terms of efficency),
> ...since you are using Pd :-)
> gfmasd
> IOhannes
> ______________________________**_________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/**
> listinfo/pd-list <http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20121231/68a56540/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list