[PD] 1-inlet [list] : bug? WAS: enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?

[Joel Matthys]

Thanks so much! I know how frustrating it can be to track down problems 
in C strings.

Joel

On 01/22/2013 11:28 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Ok, I think found the issue, it was a stupid C string mistake on my part,
> here's the commit:
>
> http://pure-data.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=pure-data/pd-extended.git;a=commitdiff;h=7de958b3f4504e9504649944e015e5c13e28df33
>
> Please test tomorrow's build and let me know if it fixes it for you.
>
> .hc
>
> On 01/22/2013 09:58 PM, Joel Matthys wrote:
>> No, I get one inlet on list.
>>
>> Joel
>>
>> On 01/22/2013 07:15 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>> Do you get the right two inlet [list] if you run it like this:
>>>
>>> $ pd-extended -noprefs
>>>
>>> .hc
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list