[PD] Fwd: absolute vs relative filepath on oggread~

[Jonathan Wilkes]

----- Original Message -----
> From: IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>
> To: pd-list at iem.at
> Cc: 
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 12:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [PD] Fwd: absolute vs relative filepath on oggread~
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 2013-02-11 18:31, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
>> 
>>  BTW, what is the advantage of canvasname?
> 
> the advantage over what?
> iemguts does not seek to compete with other objects. instead it mainly
> aims to provide low-level access to the patching system.
> 
>>  Seems to me that the only reason it exists is because having 
>>  multiple instances of same abstractions makes it difficult to 
>>  differentiate between them, which in case of pd-l2ork's 
>>  preset_hub/preset_name is completely a non-issue.
> 
> i think you are mistaking [canvasname] for some user-driven feature of
> pd-l2ork. you might be able to implement such a feature with
> [canvasname], but it's not already the implementation.
> (and actually i think that it is not very good at implementing this
> very feature...)
> 
> in practice, i've been using this object to implement an automatic
> version control system for patching.

And I use [f]x[+ 1] to count numbers, but I think we've covered the current
possibilities for the OP to retrieve the patch directory and patch name.

-Jonathan

> 
> 
> 
> fgasdmkr
> IOhannes
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAlEZLMcACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvSntACfdUE30J3HKBU196CffckCoEFB
> qUYAoImVvyuRhmYVfcE5Gx6K9BAunu0b
> =tXu0
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>