[PD] [GEM] pix_write numbering

Antoine Villeret antoine.villeret at gmail.com
Tue Mar 19 14:34:33 CET 2013


Hi,

I totally agree with you Fero, I experienced the same difficulty to use
images written with pix_write in pix_multiimage.
I made a script to rename the files.
But it could good to have an option like 'pix_write_naming_style' in
pix_multiimage which can make both working together, isn't it ?

Cheers

a

--
do it yourself
http://antoine.villeret.free.fr


2013/3/19 Fero Kiraly <fero.kiraly at gmail.com>

> Hi all,
>
> why is pix_write numbering files like this ? :
> 00000
> 00001
> 00002
> ...
> 00253
> ...
>
>
> and pix_multiimage is supposed to read files with 'clear' numbering like
> this:
> 0
> 1
> 2
> ..
> 256
>
>
> in this situation is a little bit complicated to write and read the shots..
> I solve situation with renaming file using [ggee/shell].
>
> I think, it will be clearer to use one type of numbering.
> Or I am am wrong ?
>
> f.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20130319/ed4afd14/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list