[PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency
Martin Peach
martin.peach at sympatico.ca
Thu Apr 25 16:31:08 CEST 2013
Well, [udpsend~] is meant to work with [udpreceive~], so you really have
to run Pd on both ends of the connection. Of course you are free to
modify the code to make it work with your setup -- that would mean
integrating [udpsend~] into the server and [udpreceive~] into the
clients' browsers, which I have no idea how to do.
Martin
On 2013-04-25 10:14, onyx at onyx-ashanti.com wrote:
> Greetings! I hope all is well with you. I wanted to ask if i might
> gain some of your insight on a project i am undertaking.
>
> I am currently attempting to stream my audio into html5 capable web
> browsers of smartphones. i have created a local network and installed
> nginx as my webserver. i and a friend got everything working with the
> oggcast~ and mp3cast~ objects and the icecast 2 server, but the latency
> was horrific-5-15seconds. I would like to investigate the idea of
> taking advantage of the plugin-less nature of these modern fast browsers
> and pipe the audio directly into it as directly as possible the same way
> voip works but lower bandwidth and only one way.
>
> I see that udpsend~ can do alot of what i think i want, but i am
> confused as to how i might connect it with the audio socket in the
> client browser (if socket is even the right term).
>
> Any insight would be greatly appreciated. and if i get it working, as
> before, i will document the findings in a step by step once it works.
> thank you.
>
> cheers!
>
> Onyx
>
> --
> www.onyx-ashanti.com <http://www.onyx-ashanti.com>
>
>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list