[PD] writesf~ time to flush to disk…?

Dan Wilcox danomatika at gmail.com
Tue Oct 1 18:47:21 CEST 2013

Speaking of bangs doing the job, I wish [tabread] had a right outlet that banged when you gave it an out of bound index. I was trying to make a vanilla version of [tabdump] and that would allow me to know when I've read the whole table without needing to know it's size explicitly.

On Oct 1, 2013, at 6:00 PM, pd-list-request at iem.at wrote:

> From: Jamie Bullock <jamie at jamiebullock.com>
> Subject: Re: [PD] writesf~ time to flush to disk…?
> Date: October 1, 2013 5:26:49 PM GMT+08:00
> To: Thomas Mayer <thomas at residuum.org>
> Cc: pd-list at iem.at
> On 1 Oct 2013, at 09:27, Thomas Mayer <thomas at residuum.org> wrote:
>> On 30.09.2013 17:22, Jamie Bullock wrote:
>>> Could an outlet be added to writesf~, outputing the number of samples written to disk?
>>> The parent patch could then use this outlet to establish when writesf~ is ready to receive another "open".
>> I like the idea, but the outlet could just output a bang, when it is
>> done, otherwise how do you determine that writesf~ has written all
>> samples to disk?
> I meant that it should just output the _total_ samples written after it has flushed to disk. This would be consistent with the behaviour of  [soundfiler] I believe.
> But yes, a bang would do the job.
> best,
> Jamie

Dan Wilcox

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20131002/f38b510c/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list