[PD] tabread2~ noisy output

[William Brent]

I was thinking it might be related to your file's 24-bit sample encoding
and was going to suggest soundfiler's "raw" message to be specific about
that. But if you're getting perfect results with vline~ and not phasor~, it
sounds like that's not the issue. Are you using the 64-bit Pd for OSX?


On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:26 PM, peiman khosravi
<peimankhosravi at gmail.com>wrote:

> But it doesn't end there. It's also an issue with phasor~. At the right
> sampling rate, it works with vline~ but not with phasor. As in phasor
> introduces those noises.
>
>
>
>
> *www.peimankhosravi.co.uk || RSS Feed<http://peimankhosravi.co.uk/miscposts.rss> ||
> Concert News <http://spectralkimia.wordpress.com/>*
>
>
> On 29 October 2013 19:13, peiman khosravi <peimankhosravi at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I think I have it figured out. Problem was inconsistency between the PD
>> sample rate and the soundfile's sample rate. Not sure how that works but it
>> seems to add some sort of ring modulation to the result.
>>
>> P
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *www.peimankhosravi.co.uk || RSS Feed<http://peimankhosravi.co.uk/miscposts.rss> ||
>> Concert News <http://spectralkimia.wordpress.com/>*
>>
>>
>> On 29 October 2013 17:50, peiman khosravi <peimankhosravi at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Also, even with the array max size of 2^24 I'm still getting the noise.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *www.peimankhosravi.co.uk || RSS Feed<http://peimankhosravi.co.uk/miscposts.rss> ||
>>> Concert News <http://spectralkimia.wordpress.com/>*
>>>
>>>
>>> On 29 October 2013 16:50, peiman khosravi <peimankhosravi at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oh I see. So it's to do with the size of the array. Thanks for that.
>>>>
>>>> Now, is there a workaround, other than reading the file directly from
>>>> the disk?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Peiman
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *www.peimankhosravi.co.uk || RSS Feed<http://peimankhosravi.co.uk/miscposts.rss> ||
>>>> Concert News <http://spectralkimia.wordpress.com/>*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 29 October 2013 12:56, Claude Heiland-Allen <claude at mathr.co.uk>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 29/10/13 12:36, peiman khosravi wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> An
>>>>>> artefact of the sample interpolation perhaps?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No, of limited precision in the index:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/**pipermail/pd-list/2012-07/**097073.html<http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2012-07/097073.html>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Claude
>>>>> --
>>>>> http://mathr.co.uk
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/**
>>>>> listinfo/pd-list <http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>


-- 
William Brent
www.williambrent.com

“Great minds flock together”
Conflations: conversational idiom for the 21st century

www.conflations.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20131030/39e653c5/attachment.htm>