[PD] libpd separating gui from core

[Ivica Bukvic]

While it would be incredibly pretentious of me to even think about
proposing pd-l2ork as an upstream standard, What I can share instead is
that I welcome all submissions and as was the case with patches submitted
so far we try to merge them quickly provided there are no major
showstoppers. Even if there are problems, we try to work with the patch and
adapt it to better conform or standards. I maintain a public priority todo
list and project's primary focus is on maintaining stable environment
between the releases. Similarly, if anyone is interested in seriously
contributing, I'll gladly get you git access.

HTH
On Feb 26, 2014 3:01 PM, "Rafael Vega" <email.rafa at gmail.com> wrote:

> So to keep this from becoming yet another copy of a previous thread in the
>> archive, here's the thing: someone has to step up and say, "I am going to
>> maintain 'core Pd'."  That would mean listening to the needs of the
>> community, reviewing patches, and _delegating_ responsibilities.
>>
>
> Yes! I really hope someone takes on the challenge. Perhaps we can crowd
> fund/donate/whatever some of the initial work?
>
> IMO, Pd was such a great invention that it managed to stay rolling all
> these years despite of the lack of a clear path for contributors and a
> common upstream but the inertia is dying off now as this thread explains.
> It's been fascinating for me to see what has happened with OpenFrameworks
> and their "Do it with others" philosophy. It would be great if the Pd
> community would migrate into something similar.
>
> Optimistically,
>
> Rafael.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20140226/a24ed8c9/attachment.htm>