[PD] So [bang~] can't "bang" in less than 64 blocksize, huh?

Alexandre Torres Porres porres at gmail.com
Sat Mar 14 06:02:31 CET 2015

attached patch

2015-03-14 2:02 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com>:

> I was trying to get a bang at every sample and found out that the minimum
> time bang~ works is at the 64 blocksize, check attached patch.
> Anyway, no question, just saying... but yeah, I don't see why it has to be
> this way. Hopefully it can increase its resolution someday.
> cheers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150314/f3682f41/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bang~.pd
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 760 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150314/f3682f41/attachment.obj>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list