[PD] So [bang~] can't "bang" in less than 64 blocksize, huh?

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

> there must be other examples...

like from control objects, seems the bang GUI will also only fire at 64
block periods.

sorry if I annoy, but I find it all curious and interesting

2015-03-14 3:36 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com>:

> It seems there are other objects that somehow restrict themselves to a 64
> size block minimum.
>
> print~ will always start printing from the beginning of a 64 block period
>
> snapshot~ will always output the last sample from an audio block of 64
>
> there must be other examples...
>
> cheers
>
> 2015-03-14 2:02 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com>:
>
>> attached patch
>>
>> 2015-03-14 2:02 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> I was trying to get a bang at every sample and found out that the
>>> minimum time bang~ works is at the 64 blocksize, check attached patch.
>>>
>>> Anyway, no question, just saying... but yeah, I don't see why it has to
>>> be this way. Hopefully it can increase its resolution someday.
>>>
>>> cheers
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150314/e2bb2494/attachment-0001.html>