[PD] Problems with maintaining Pd-extended (was Mess and redundancy...)

Alexandre Torres Porres porres at gmail.com
Sat Jun 6 19:34:04 CEST 2015


[?][?][?][?][?]

2015-06-06 13:37 GMT-03:00 Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com>:

> To save extra discussion energy and *possibly* let the “cat out of the
> bag” let me say this: just wait a bit, something good is in the works to
> offer a solution to many of these problems.
>
> I won't say anything more until the parties involved feel they are ready.
> --------
> Dan Wilcox
> @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
> danomatika.com
> robotcowboy.com
>
> On Jun 6, 2015, at 11:39 AM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
>
> I know I'm missing much of the technical details, but my idea is that if
> Pd Extended is up and running, it should be fairly easy for people to
> update libraries (like Fred is doing with cyclone now) and release an
> updated version with the updated objects... meaning we didn't have to wait
> for two years for a bug fix. But somehow this only makes sense in the
> "vanilla route".
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150606/62e92466/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: B0C.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 125 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150606/62e92466/attachment.gif>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list