[PD] expr is now BSD (was "looking for other vanilla filters or abstractions for libPD")

[Dan Wilcox]

Obviously not. :P

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
> On Nov 13, 2015, at 8:34 AM, Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > The whole license thing was kind of a pain to figure out as nobody seemed to know the technicalities at the time.
> 
> Did you contact one of the various organizations that handle licensing issues 
> for free software communities?
> 
> -Jonathan
> 
> On Thursday, November 12, 2015 8:10 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Seriously though, I *think* I was the one who suggested LGPL when we did this the first time, so it’s on me. The whole license thing was kind of a pain to figure out as nobody seemed to know the technicalities at the time.
> 
> I personally favor GPL licenses, but they obviously don’t work with Apple’s licensing. At the time, LGPL ver 2 *kind of* could slide through *if* you distributed the source code itself so people could build new versions of the app (which is what I planned to do). LGPL 3 closed that loophole and expr was relicensed as LGPL 3 so here we are. I didn’t want to *assume* the original authors wanted to move away form the GPL that much, so LGPL seemed like a compromise. (Obviously, Apple’s policies are the real issue here.)
> 
> Anyway, if it’s the same BSD license as pd itself, we should be good … but don;t quote me on that this time. :P
> 
> --------
> Dan Wilcox
> @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
>> On Nov 12, 2015, at 5:54 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com <mailto:danomatika at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
> 
> Oh, I was just waiting for you to tell us what to do. :D
> 
> --------
> Dan Wilcox
> @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
>> On Nov 12, 2015, at 5:49 PM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list-request at lists.iem.at> wrote:
>> 
>> I suggest this because we've devoted our non-expert energy to licensing 
>> issues for expr once already, and it resulted in a license choice that wasn't even 
>> compatible with the proposed use-case.
> 
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20151113/570fc211/attachment.html>