[PD] 0 length delay in delwrite~

[Roman Haefeli]

On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 14:26 -0200, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> hi, I'm checking that if you put a 0 length delay in delwrite~ you
> still have some buffer
> 
> 
> what's up with that? and how does it work? how big is it when you
> don't define it?

Don't know. I confirm that weirdness happens when setting [delwrite~] to
0. In other words: The only value that does not justify using a delay at
all shows unexpected behavior. I can live with that.

> I always get a minimum dealy even with order forcing (and different
> values depending on extended orvanilla), it seems the delay needs to
> be at least the block size to work properly
> 
> 
> moreover, I can't have an order forcing 

Order forcing works well for me. Just set the [delwrite~] to 10 (and
[delread~] to 0) in your patch and the number box shows 0 (this means
zero delay, right?).

Roman

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20151212/008fa815/attachment.sig>