[PD] [ot] Re: garbled list digests?

Max abonnements at revolwear.com
Tue Mar 29 18:56:31 CEST 2016


Mailman seems to be smarter than Thunderbird in this case. That said,
I've seen this issue manifest in tha archives countless times too.
https://imgur.com/8T3NUYM


On 2016년 03월 30일 01:31, Dan Wilcox wrote:
> I did? Looks fine
> here: http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2016-03/thread.html
> 
> --------
> Dan Wilcox
> @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com>
> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com>
> 
>> On Mar 29, 2016, at 10:28 AM, Max <abonnements at revolwear.com
>> <mailto:abonnements at revolwear.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 2016년 03월 30일 00:49, Dan Wilcox wrote:
>>>> On Mar 29, 2016, at 3:46 AM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at
>>>> <mailto:pd-list-request at lists.iem.at>
>>>> <mailto:pd-list-request at lists.iem.at> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> (e.g. if the reason is to not be drowned in the flood of Pd-list mails,
>>>> a better solution is to filter them into a separate mail folder)
>>>
>>> I already do, just want a low volume in general.
>>
>> and congratulations, you just started a new thread to the same topic.
>>
> 




More information about the Pd-list mailing list