[PD] deken install user experience

[Roman Haefeli]

On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 14:14 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2016-06-09 10:33, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > 
> > Sorry if I missed this, but what is the point of displaying
> > incompatible (wrong arch, wrong platform) Deken packages? What
> > would be
> > harmed if they'd be hidden completely? I fail to see the advantage
> > of
> > having the possibility of downloading a package of wrong
> > arch/platform.
> like: preparing your patch for offline use on multiple archs, which
> you
> currently don't have access to.
> 
> or: checking whether the library exists at all, and if I could nag
> its
> osx maintainer to give me w32 binaries.
> 

Right. Both makes sense to me.

Roman
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160609/29cb1dc3/attachment.sig>