[PD] pix_dump after pix_mask does not work properly

[cyrille henry]

hello,

if you send the beng during the gemchain interpretation, the 2 print are different.
i guess it will solve your problem.
cheer

c



Le 16/06/2016 18:38, mick mengucci a écrit :
> Hallo list,
> I have a problem in getting the pixels' values of two different images with [pix_dump].
>
> The images are the output of two different [pix_mask] objects on the same original image.
>
> What I get is the list of pixels' values of the original image.
>
> I see IOhannes answered that [pix_mask] objects do not work "in chain", maybe that's why it does not work. If so, is there any workaround?
> I include the files with the mask images in attachment.
> I hope someone can explain this to me!
>
> I run Xubuntu 14.04.4 LTS, with Pd 0.46.2, GEM: ver: 0.93.git 1d4d372
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> mickmengucci.bandcamp.com <http://mickmengucci.bandcamp.com>
> facebook.com/mickmengucci3 <http://facebook.com/mickmengucci3>
> facebook.com/Labio.pt <http://facebook.com/Labio.pt>
> <http://WWW.MISTURAPURA.NET>MISTURAPURA.NET <http://WWW.MISTURAPURA.NET>
> pure mixture vibration since 1995
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: imgtest2.pd
Type: application/puredata
Size: 3718 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160616/2aa3ba52/attachment.bin>