[PD] plans for Pd 0.48

José Rafael Subía Valdez jsubiavaldez at gmail.com
Mon Jan 2 23:53:52 CET 2017

Just that not having an apply means that you need to accept the changes and
that closes the dialog, so if you dont like the result, you need to go into
the properties again, with an apply button, you could see the results
before quitting that menu.

I don't understand, so you mean that this is the definite ruling on that? I
thought maybe a better solution was being researched. I miss the "Apply"

On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com> wrote:

> Howdy José,
> I updated the overall dialogs, including live updates without the Apply
> button on OSX. This work is overall finalized and included with Pd 0.47.
> Can you explain what you mean by: "This really makes programming GUI very
> time wasting."
> --------
> Dan Wilcox
> @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
> danomatika.com
> robotcowboy.com
> On Jan 2, 2017, at 1:17 PM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
> *From: *José Rafael Subía Valdez <jsubiavaldez at gmail.com>
> *Subject: **Re: [PD] plans for Pd 0.48*
> *Date: *January 2, 2017 at 1:00:05 PM MST
> *To: *"pd-list at iem.at" <pd-list at iem.at>
> Hello list,
> just to ask if there is any ruling on the Apple Human Interface
> Guidelines for the "apply" button in properties. This really makes
> programming GUI very time wasting. I do not know it what stage is this in.
> I know the other topics being discussed are more important in a deeper
> programming sense, but these little things add up a lot of time when
> programming.
> cheers

José Rafael Subía Valdez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20170102/a02da81d/attachment.html>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list