[PD] puredata-core installing documentation twice on Debian?

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

On 2017-02-06 14:07, Peter P. wrote:
>> this is a left-over from the days of the pipe-dreams of co-existing
>> pd-vanilla and pd-extended Debian packages.
> And could be consolidated maybe even?

well, i don't see any harm in being open to multiple (binary compatible)
implementations.
i don't see any important argument for conosolidating, so i won't do it.

>> today's forks (pd-l2ork, purrdata) actively reject the notion of binary
>> compatibility (so they must not look for externals in /usr/lib/pd/extra)
> "must not" or "do not have to"?

"binary incompatibility" doesn't necessarily mean "won't load". it's
more along the lines: will burn your computer and vote for trump.

amsdr
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20170206/e84e1454/attachment.sig>