[PD] why not Purr Data?
batchku at gmail.com
Mon Oct 2 19:05:27 CEST 2017
Great the Jonathan has joined this thread.
What keeps Purr data from running the latest pd core (0.48) and leaving
aside things that Purr can do that vanilla can't (i.e. $0 in message box),
are there any concerns going the other way? i.e. basic things that vanilla
can do that Purr cant?
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list <
pd-list at lists.iem.at> wrote:
> > Many of my patches that I developed on Pure Data don't run without
> > modification in Purr Data. Some crash at loading, some look graphically
> > weird
> Typically, "crashers" and "freezers" get fixed pretty quick in Purr Data.
> The only freezer I remember with one of your patches was due to a
> broken object triggering an infinite loop in your patch's [until] object.
> pretty sure that was an alpha or beta version, and I'm pretty sure I fixed
> whatever object it was that wouldn't create.
> I don't see any other relevant crashers listed on the tracker:
> What am I missing?
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list