[PD] why not Purr Data?

[Ali Momeni]

Great the Jonathan has joined this thread.

What keeps Purr data from running the latest pd core (0.48) and leaving
aside things that Purr can do that vanilla can't (i.e. $0 in message box),
are there any concerns going the other way?  i.e. basic things that vanilla
can do that Purr cant?

On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list <
pd-list at lists.iem.at> wrote:

> > Many of my patches that I developed on Pure Data don't run without
> > modification in Purr Data. Some crash at loading, some look graphically
> > weird
>
> Typically, "crashers" and "freezers" get fixed pretty quick in Purr Data.
>
> The only freezer I remember with one of your patches was due to a
> broken object triggering an infinite loop in your patch's [until] object.
> I'm
> pretty sure that was an alpha or beta version, and I'm pretty sure I fixed
> whatever object it was that wouldn't create.
>
> I don't see any other relevant crashers listed on the tracker:
>
> https://git.purrdata.net/jwilkes/purr-data/issues
>
> What am I missing?
>
> -Jonathan
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/
> listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20171002/0af210cc/attachment-0001.html>